步步惊心：丽

B | 小编熬夜写稿、费心费力换来的"金贵名额"，给谁，不得请个“大餐”，请小编喝两杯。现在可不一样了，名额送出去了，中奖跑友欢天喜地来领，一听"直通但需要交报名费"，转身就走："算了，不要了"。    TOKYO -- The operator of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant said the discharge of the second batch of treated radioactive wastewater into the sea ended as planned on Monday, and International Atomic Energy Agency officials in Japan for their first safety and monitoring mission since the release began two months ago said “no issues” were observed.Fukushima Daiichi started releasing treated and diluted radioactive wastewater into the sea on Aug. 24. The operator, Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, said the release of a second, 7,800-ton batch of treated wastewater was completed, with its daily seawater sampling results fully meeting safety standards.A magnitude 9.0 quake on March 11, 2011, triggered a massive tsunami that destroyed the plant’s power supply and cooling systems, causing three reactors to melt and spew large amounts of radiation. Highly contaminated cooling water applied to the damaged reactors has leaked continuously into building basements and mixed with groundwater.The release of treated wastewater is expected to continue for decades. It has been strongly opposed by fishing groups and neighboring countries including South Korea, where hundreds of people have protested. China banned all imports of Japanese seafood the day the release began, badly hurting Japanese seafood producers, processors and exporters. Russia recently joined China in the trade restrictions.“I would say that the first two batches of releases went well. No issues were observed," Lydie Evrard, IAEA deputy director general and head of the department of nuclear safety and security, told a Tokyo news conference. She said she visited Fukushima Daiichi on Friday for a firsthand look.Evrard's visit came on the heels of a marine sampling mission by another IAEA team that included scientists from China, South Korea and Canada. She said all participants in that mission said their activity went well. She did not say whether Chinese scientists acknowledged the safety of the release.She said China has been involved in the IAEA safety task force since the beginning of the review that began two years ago and has participated in corroboration activities. The IAEA is aware of China’s concern and engaged with its authorities, Evrard said.Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, in his policy speech Monday, renewed his call for China to immediately lift its ban on Japanese seafood imports.During the Oct. 16-23 visit, the IAEA sampling team collected seawater, sediment and fish from near the plant and visited a marine laboratory near Tokyo that makes fish specimens for radiation analysis by institutions in and outside Japan, including the IAEA.During Evrard's visit, IAEA task force and Japanese officials are expected to discuss the safety of the ongoing discharge and their future mission plans, with a report expected by the end of the year. She said the discharge plan would be updated with new findings and data collected over the past two months.The IAEA, based on its two-year review of TEPCO's wastewater release plan, concluded in July that if it is carried out as planned, it will have a negligible impact on the environment, marine life and human health.Japan’s government and TEPCO say the discharge is unavoidable because wastewater storage tanks at the plant will be full next year. They say the water produced by the damaged plant is treated to reduce radioactivity to safe levels, and then diluted with massive amounts of seawater to make it much safer than international standards.TEPCO has said it plans to release 31,200 tons of treated water by the end of March 2024, which would empty only 10 tanks out of 1,000 because of the continued production of wastewater at the plant.。

C | 在中签率很低的情况下，白给的直通名额都送不出去。马拉松的名额，难道真的不值钱了？两极分化头部赛事确实一票难求，普通赛事和"搭售式直通"或许才是真正的无人问津。

D | 名额的价值正在剧烈分化——"金贵名额"还是金贵的，贬值的只是那些"自己以为很金贵"的名额。马拉松赛事自己制造抽签假象，原来有媒体不断报道，自己捏造更低的中签率，制造跑友焦虑和恐慌。

E | 这种饥饿营销方法，屡试不爽。很多聪明的跑友从完赛人数的排名，可以推测出真正的参赛人数，有些赛事参赛人数不足规模总数的五成，何来的抽签？赛事好坏，其实中签率不能说明问题，跑友心里自然有杆秤。当所谓的"直通"不再是稀缺资源，而只是"省去抽签"的鸡肋，跑友自然会用脚投票：有些赛事报都报不满，何来的“直通”？跑友清醒很多跑马多年的老司机，参赛的理念不断从"跟风参赛"转向"理性择赛"，选择越来越理性。很多跑友都表示："以前看到比赛就想报名，现在更看重赛道品质、服务保障和城市特色，会精挑细选优质赛事。"钱要花在刀刃上。与其花几千块去跑一场毫无记忆点的赛事，不如攒着钱跑一场真正想要的赛事。

F | 有些赛事的"名额"不再是稀缺品，"去不去"就成了纯粹的经济账。钱包紧了跑圈内卷，很多跑友通过跑步赚不到钱，也就不想花钱了。网红跑者的奇装异服被严管，精英选手的赞助费越来越薄，草根跑团的团报优惠基本绝迹。当很多跑友无法通过跑步获得收益，纯支出的参赛就变成了"亏本买卖"。

G | 一场赛事，从报名费，到交通费、食宿费，再加上日常的装备费用，一场赛事多则几千块，少则也得大几百。从另一个方面而言，跑友减少参赛的频率，也有另一个好处——省钱。当经济下行撞上跑圈内卷，"花钱买罪受"的性价比急剧下降。行业规范新规之下，马拉松的本质被重新强调，它不是全民健身项目，而是极限运动。很多赛事也在不断提升报名的门槛，报名全马需要提供一年内的A类马拉松赛事的成绩，其他赛事都不算，还需要有健康的体检证明。甚至有些赛事通过中签率，不断刷掉年龄大的跑友。赛事对跑友参赛也更加严格了，倡导的赛事各种文明，束缚了很多跑友的自由发挥。一些想通过赛事哗众取宠，博流量的跑友，也失去了对马拉松的兴趣。价值回归回到最初的话题，直通名额到底值不值钱？从深层次看：跑友变了。他们不再是那个"有马就跑、有名额就拿"的初学者，而是会算账、会挑选、会权衡的成熟消费者。赛事变了。

H | 新政之下，赛事总量在减少，优质赛事在集中，劣质供给在被慢慢地淘汰。名额也变了。当"直通"只是"省一次抽签"，对于报名不满的赛事，就没有了任何价值。真正稀缺的，还是那些"赛道好、组织棒、服务优、城市美"的头部赛事的“直通”。或许，真正优质的参赛“直通”，正在新规和市场的双重筛选中，变得越来越贵、越来越难得。对跑友来说，这其实是好事，不用再为"面子名额"买单，可以把钱和精力，留给真正值得的那场马。毕竟，跑步的初衷是健康与热爱，不是朋友圈的一块奖牌，更不是别人眼里"你有名额"的羡慕。亲爱的跑友，您说呢？欢迎大家留言参与讨论。